SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 1805.09208 · 2018

Pushing the bounds of dropout

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We have not lifted any functions out of this paper's repositories yet, so there is nothing we have run. If it links a repository, it is listed below.

Abstract

We show that dropout training is best understood as performing MAP estimation concurrently for a family of conditional models whose objectives are themselves lower bounded by the original dropout objective. This discovery allows us to pick any model from this family after training, which leads to a substantial improvement on regularisation-heavy language modelling. The family includes models that compute a power mean over the sampled dropout masks, and their less stochastic subvariants with tighter and higher lower bounds than the fully stochastic dropout objective. We argue that since the deterministic subvariant's bound is equal to its objective, and the highest amongst these models, the predominant view of it as a good approximation to MC averaging is misleading. Rather, deterministic dropout is the best available approximation to the true objective.

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("1805.09208")
get_code_for_paper("1805.09208")
have("1805.09208")

Connect an agent — have() is free.