Eugene Golikov
We lifted 1 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.
| Repository | Role | Ran |
|---|---|---|
| deepmipt/infinite-width_nets | — | 1 of 1 |
| Function | Status | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| LinearizedModel | Ran | deepmipt/infinite-width_nets/utils/models.py pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("2572ab529244fdec") |
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Obtaining theoretical guarantees for neural networks training appears to be a hard problem in a general case. Recent research has been focused on studying this problem in the limit of infinite width and two different theories have been developed: a mean-field (MF) and a constant kernel (NTK) limit theories. We propose a general framework that provides a link between these seemingly distinct theories. Our framework out of the box gives rise to a discrete-time MF limit which was not previously explored in the literature. We prove a convergence theorem for it, and show that it provides a more reasonable approximation for finite-width nets compared to the NTK limit if learning rates are not very small. Also, our framework suggests a limit model that coincides neither with the MF limit nor with the NTK one. We show that for networks with more than two hidden layers RMSProp training has a non-trivial discrete-time MF limit but GD training does not have one. Overall, our framework demonstrates that both MF and NTK limits have considerable limitations in approximating finite-sized neural nets, indicating the need for designing more accurate infinite-width approximations for them.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2003.05884")
get_code_for_paper("2003.05884")
have("2003.05884")
Connect an agent — have() is free.