Pinghui Wang, Nuo Xu, Long Chen, Junzhou Zhao, Xiaoyan Wang, Li Pan
We have not lifted any functions out of this paper's repositories yet, so there is nothing we have run. If it links a repository, it is listed below.
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is the task of automatically predicting a law case's judgment results given a text describing its facts, which has excellent prospects in judicial assistance systems and convenient services for the public. In practice, confusing charges are frequent, because law cases applicable to similar law articles are easily misjudged. For addressing this issue, the existing method relies heavily on domain experts, which hinders its application in different law systems. In this paper, we present an end-to-end model, LADAN, to solve the task of LJP. To distinguish confusing charges, we propose a novel graph neural network to automatically learn subtle differences between confusing law articles and design a novel attention mechanism that fully exploits the learned differences to extract compelling discriminative features from fact descriptions attentively. Experiments conducted on realworld datasets demonstrate the superiority of our LADAN.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2004.02557")
get_code_for_paper("2004.02557")
have("2004.02557")
Connect an agent — have() is free.