SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 2106.02775 · 2021

Visual communication of object concepts at different levels of abstraction

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We lifted 11 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.

RepositoryRoleRan
cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021 canonical 1 of 11
FunctionStatusWhere it lives
str2bool Ran cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/download_data.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("8c0dec327bfce0f2")
alphanum_key Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/stimuli/kiddraw_generate_stims/helpers.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("e06c245618bb8b85")
between_condition_RDM Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/utils.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("d221a4dc1a8e0b94")
compute_f_stat Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/utils.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("2685085e24c53137")
list_files Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/extract_features.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("c2bdef108b83aa33")
load_text Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/stimuli/kiddraw_generate_stims/helpers.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("1d41736cb4633642")
make_dataframe Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/extract_features.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("62d6a53a8a86305c")
make_dir_if_not_exists Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/download_data.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("30121777abdceb1a")
normalize Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/extract_features.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("cc4d67dc6208e4da")
preprocess_sketches Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/analysis/utils.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("edcb6d5480ed19e4")
tryint Not yet run cogtoolslab/photodraw_cogsci2021/stimuli/kiddraw_generate_stims/helpers.py
code served (permissive licence) · get_code("4920e8e81daa2250")

Repositories linked to this paper

Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.

Abstract

People can produce drawings of specific entities (e.g., Garfield), as well as general categories (e.g., "cat"). What explains this ability to produce such varied drawings of even highly familiar object concepts? We hypothesized that drawing objects at different levels of abstraction depends on both sensory information and representational goals, such that drawings intended to portray a recently seen object preserve more detail than those intended to represent a category. Participants drew objects cued either with a photo or a category label. For each cue type, half the participants aimed to draw a specific exemplar; the other half aimed to draw the category. We found that label-cued category drawings were the most recognizable at the basic level, whereas photo-cued exemplar drawings were the least recognizable. Together, these findings highlight the importance of task context for explaining how people use drawings to communicate visual concepts in different ways.

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("2106.02775")
get_code_for_paper("2106.02775")
have("2106.02775")

Connect an agent — have() is free.