We lifted 2 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.
| Repository | Role | Ran |
|---|---|---|
| christianreiser/correlate | canonical | 1 of 2 |
| Function | Status | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| external_independencies_var_names_to_int | Ran | christianreiser/correlate/causal_discovery/LPCMCI/observational_discovery.py pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("5aec868c6805852d") |
| if_intervened_replace_with_nan | Not yet run | christianreiser/correlate/causal_discovery/LPCMCI/observational_discovery.py pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("78289cd5201200af") |
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Reconstructing the causal relationships behind the phenomena we observe is a fundamental challenge in all areas of science. Discovering causal relationships through experiments is often infeasible, unethical, or expensive in complex systems. However, increases in computational power allow us to process the ever-growing amount of data that modern science generates, leading to an emerging interest in the causal discovery problem from observational data. This work evaluates the LPCMCI algorithm, which aims to find generators compatible with a multi-dimensional, highly autocorrelated time series while some variables are unobserved. We find that LPCMCI performs much better than a random algorithm mimicking not knowing anything but is still far from optimal detection. Furthermore, LPCMCI performs best on auto-dependencies, then contemporaneous dependencies, and struggles most with lagged dependencies. The source code of this project is available online.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2209.03427")
get_code_for_paper("2209.03427")
have("2209.03427")
Connect an agent — have() is free.