SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 2304.02819 · 2023

GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We lifted 1 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.

RepositoryRoleRan
weixin-liang/chatgpt-detector-bias canonical 1 of 1
FunctionStatusWhere it lives
pubs_dataset Ran weixin-liang/chatgpt-detector-bias/Code/extract_scores.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("da7564d16d43202a")

Repositories linked to this paper

Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.

Abstract

The rapid adoption of generative language models has brought about substantial advancements in digital communication, while simultaneously raising concerns regarding the potential misuse of AI-generated content. Although numerous detection methods have been proposed to differentiate between AI and human-generated content, the fairness and robustness of these detectors remain underexplored. In this study, we evaluate the performance of several widely-used GPT detectors using writing samples from native and non-native English writers. Our findings reveal that these detectors consistently misclassify non-native English writing samples as AI-generated, whereas native writing samples are accurately identified. Furthermore, we demonstrate that simple prompting strategies can not only mitigate this bias but also effectively bypass GPT detectors, suggesting that GPT detectors may unintentionally penalize writers with constrained linguistic expressions. Our results call for a broader conversation about the ethical implications of deploying ChatGPT content detectors and caution against their use in evaluative or educational settings, particularly when they may inadvertently penalize or exclude non-native English speakers from the global discourse. The published version of this study can be accessed at: www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(23)00130-7

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("2304.02819")
get_code_for_paper("2304.02819")
have("2304.02819")

Connect an agent — have() is free.