SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 2304.12986 · 2023

Measuring Massive Multitask Chinese Understanding

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We lifted 3 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 3 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.

RepositoryRoleRan
Felixgithub2017/MMCU canonical 2 of 2
copy not recorded — 1 of 1
FunctionStatusWhere it lives
find_valid_substrings Ran Felixgithub2017/MMCU/TestBloomz.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("5dda29b6436a1765")
format_example Ran Felixgithub2017/MMCU/TestBloomz.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("a4f2a52c39dd4a34")
format_subject Ran this paper's copy was not recorded; identical code first harvested from pjlab-sys4nlp/llama-moe
pointer only · get_code("6ab745408cb8648b")

Repositories linked to this paper

Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.

Abstract

The development of large-scale Chinese language models is flourishing, yet there is a lack of corresponding capability assessments. Therefore, we propose a test to measure the multitask accuracy of large Chinese language models. This test encompasses four major domains, including medicine, law, psychology, and education, with 15 subtasks in medicine and 8 subtasks in education. We found that the best-performing models in the zero-shot setting outperformed the worst-performing models by nearly 18.6 percentage points on average. Across the four major domains, the highest average zero-shot accuracy of all models is 0.512. In the subdomains, only the GPT-3.5-turbo model achieved a zero-shot accuracy of 0.693 in clinical medicine, which was the highest accuracy among all models across all subtasks. All models performed poorly in the legal domain, with the highest zero-shot accuracy reaching only 0.239. By comprehensively evaluating the breadth and depth of knowledge across multiple disciplines, this test can more accurately identify the shortcomings of the models.

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("2304.12986")
get_code_for_paper("2304.12986")
have("2304.12986")

Connect an agent — have() is free.