SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 2310.06824 · 2023

The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We lifted 2 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.

RepositoryRoleRan
saprmarks/geometry-of-truth canonical 0 of 1
copy not recorded — 1 of 1
FunctionStatusWhere it lives
load_statements Ran this paper's copy was not recorded; identical code first harvested from sciai-lab/truth_is_universal
pointer only · get_code("f0cc63177ce8b7a1")
get_acts Not yet run saprmarks/geometry-of-truth/generate_acts.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("7a6be95124119a2b")

Repositories linked to this paper

Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but are prone to outputting falsehoods. Recent work has developed techniques for inferring whether a LLM is telling the truth by training probes on the LLM's internal activations. However, this line of work is controversial, with some authors pointing out failures of these probes to generalize in basic ways, among other conceptual issues. In this work, we use high-quality datasets of simple true/false statements to study in detail the structure of LLM representations of truth, drawing on three lines of evidence: 1. Visualizations of LLM true/false statement representations, which reveal clear linear structure. 2. Transfer experiments in which probes trained on one dataset generalize to different datasets. 3. Causal evidence obtained by surgically intervening in a LLM's forward pass, causing it to treat false statements as true and vice versa. Overall, we present evidence that at sufficient scale, LLMs linearly represent the truth or falsehood of factual statements. We also show that simple difference-in-mean probes generalize as well as other probing techniques while identifying directions which are more causally implicated in model outputs.

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("2310.06824")
get_code_for_paper("2310.06824")
have("2310.06824")

Connect an agent — have() is free.