SYNTOLOGY HomeExplorerAtlasCodeMethodologyAboutDevelopersFeedPricing
Paper · 2403.13679 · 2024

SocialBench: Sociality Evaluation of Role-Playing Conversational Agents

arXiv · PDF · Open in the Atlas

Code that ran

We lifted 3 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 2 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.

RepositoryRoleRan
x-plug/roleinteract canonical 2 of 3
FunctionStatusWhere it lives
format_name Ran x-plug/roleinteract/dataset.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("9e20b00486307eb3")
make_group_profiles Ran x-plug/roleinteract/dataset.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("cfde14b173792b93")
json_load Not yet run x-plug/roleinteract/dataset.py
pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("62d67ba64ad1a05c")

Repositories linked to this paper

Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of various AI conversational agents, including role-playing conversational agents that mimic diverse characters and human behaviors. While prior research has predominantly focused on enhancing the conversational capability, role-specific knowledge, and stylistic attributes of these agents, there has been a noticeable gap in assessing their social intelligence. In this paper, we introduce SocialBench, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the sociality of role-playing conversational agents at both individual and group levels of social interactions. The benchmark is constructed from a variety of sources and covers a wide range of 500 characters and over 6,000 question prompts and 30,800 multi-turn role-playing utterances. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on this benchmark using mainstream open-source and closed-source LLMs. We find that agents excelling in individual level does not imply their proficiency in group level. Moreover, the behavior of individuals may drift as a result of the influence exerted by other agents within the group. Experimental results on SocialBench confirm its significance as a testbed for assessing the social interaction of role-playing conversational agents. The benchmark is publicly accessible at https://github.com/X-PLUG/SocialBench.

For agents

The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:

get_harvested_code_for_paper("2403.13679")
get_code_for_paper("2403.13679")
have("2403.13679")

Connect an agent — have() is free.