Ser-Nam Lim, Zihao Wang, Yexin Liu, Harry Yang, Mingzhe Zheng, Xianfeng Wu, Xuran Ma, Yaofu Liu, Everlyn Ai
We lifted 1 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.
| Repository | Role | Ran |
|---|---|---|
| geekguru123/profilingdit | — | 1 of 1 |
| Function | Status | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| DitCache | Ran | geekguru123/profilingdit/HunyuanVideo/hyvideo/ditcache.py pointer only (licence: NONE) · get_code("18b501ee2094dc9a") |
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Figure 1. Comparison of visual result quality across different methods. The video has a resolution of 780p and consists of 129 frames, with one representative frame extracted from each video for visualization. Our method consistently outperforms TeaCache [15] in both visual quality and efficiency. Latency is evaluated using a single H200 GPU. All results are generated with seed 42.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2504.03140")
get_code_for_paper("2504.03140")
have("2504.03140")
Connect an agent — have() is free.