Xu Chu, Kai Zhao, Guilin Zhang, Jeffrey Friedman
We lifted 4 functions out of this paper's own repositories and ran 1 of them in a sandbox. "Ran" means the function executed on a synthesized input and returned a value. It is not a reproduction of the paper's results.
| Repository | Role | Ran |
|---|---|---|
| GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain | — | 1 of 4 |
| Function | Status | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| TextSimilarity | Ran | GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain/src/evaluation/robustness_metrics.py code served (permissive licence) · get_code("a8ffcdfb17856055") |
| RobustnessAnalyzer | Not yet run | GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain/src/evaluation/robustness_metrics.py code served (permissive licence) · get_code("27562b82ad5ea307") |
| RobustnessEvaluator | Not yet run | GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain/src/evaluation/robustness_metrics.py code served (permissive licence) · get_code("aea87d4d8f445a38") |
| RobustnessResult | Not yet run | GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain/src/evaluation/robustness_metrics.py code served (permissive licence) · get_code("bd78f0c4ee5836f1") |
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate natural-language explanations in recommender systems, acting as explanation agents that reason over user behavior histories. While prior work has focused on explanation fluency and relevance under fixed inputs, the robustness of LLM-generated explanations to realistic user behavior noise remains largely unexplored. In real-world web platforms, interaction histories are inherently noisy due to accidental clicks, temporal inconsistencies, missing values, and evolving preferences, raising concerns about explanation stability and user trust. We present RobustExplain, the first systematic evaluation framework for measuring the robustness of LLM-generated recommendation explanations. Ro-bustExplain introduces five realistic user behavior perturbations evaluated across multiple severity levels and a multi-dimensional robustness metric capturing semantic, keyword, structural, and length consistency. Our goal is to establish a principled, task-level evaluation framework and initial robustness baselines, rather than to provide a comprehensive leaderboard across all available LLMs. Experiments on four representative LLMs (7B-70B) show that current models exhibit only moderate robustness, with larger models achieving up to 8% higher stability. Our results establish the first robustness benchmarks for explanation agents and highlight robustness as a critical dimension for trustworthy, agent-driven recommender systems at web scale. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/GuilinDev/LLM-Robustness-Explain . • Information systems → Recommender systems; • Computing methodologies → Natural language processing.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2601.19120")
get_code_for_paper("2601.19120")
have("2601.19120")
Connect an agent — have() is free.