Chang, Juan Perdomo, Liu, Malvina Nissim, Vecchietti, Keyon Vafa, Xinran Wang, Sayash Kapoor, Steven Skiena, Qixiang Fang, Erik-Jan Van Kesteren, Enamul Hassan, and 135 more
We have not lifted any functions out of this paper's repositories yet, so there is nothing we have run. The repositories linked to it are listed below.
Some links come from the archived Papers with Code dataset (CC BY-SA 4.0): attribution and licence.
Major life events have proven difficult to predict. Does this reflect limits of theory, data, and algorithms, or the large role of chance? We examine one outcome - having a child within three years - through a near-ideal setting for prediction: a data challenge where 147 researchers predicted births for Dutch residents aged 18-45, using survey data and full-population registers. Methods ranged from logistic regression to a large language model and transformers. Predictions were moderately accurate (best F1: register 0.59, survey 0.76); advanced models did not outperform classical ones; and the larger registers did not beat the survey. Simulating the stochastic biology of conception and pregnancy, we estimated a predictive ceiling (survey F1 ~ 0.86-0.94, register 0.88-0.96). Observed performance falls short of this ceiling, implicating imperfect data, methods, and unmodelled chance, while the ceiling itself shows that chance in reproduction alone sets a non-trivial limit on predicting individual lives.
The same record, over MCP at https://syntology.ai/mcp:
get_harvested_code_for_paper("2609.01194")
get_code_for_paper("2609.01194")
have("2609.01194")
The run record, dated, one paper per request, free:
curl https://syntology.ai/api/ran/2609.01194.json
A badge for a README (the split and the date, never a ratio):
[](https://syntology.ai/paper/2609.01194)
Connect an agent — have() is free.